<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vicarious Vanity and Meticulous Mating – not an apparent match</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dacostad.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/vicarious-vanity-and-meticulous-mating-%e2%80%93-not-an-apparent-match/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dacostad.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/vicarious-vanity-and-meticulous-mating-%e2%80%93-not-an-apparent-match/</link>
	<description>Live.Love.Listen.Laugh.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle W</title>
		<link>http://dacostad.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/vicarious-vanity-and-meticulous-mating-%e2%80%93-not-an-apparent-match/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dacostad.wordpress.com/?p=71#comment-101</guid>
		<description>I want to warn you up front that I am not a linear thinker but I must say that this piece makes me wonder about your earlier piece on femininity.  

The authors of the study do not really quantify what makes a woman attractive and I wonder if it is the trappings of the femininity that we as women seek to buy, cover up, expose, stretch, diet away, tighten, exercise, or even hide.  I am curious about the features that make me the one night stand or the future mother of your children and wife.

Femininity has always been important to me just as maculinity is important to me - I can say that I can admire a square jaw, a defined nose and nice kissable lips which are quite attractive and dare I say sexy to me - but the size of the man also helps me to define masculine - I mean in my fantasy I see him as being masculine if he can lift me up or make me feel small and delicate in size or and don&#039;t forget muscular.  These things make me want to sleep with him - I am not sure of the features that would make me even think of him as husbandly - I guess he would have to open his mouth so I could see the size of his brain to help me figure out that one.  But I would rather enjoy him first before pondering that life altering question.  Is it true that men only think about sex first and relationship second meanwhile women think the the other way around.  Now that don&#039;t sound like any kind of fun to me.

So I wonder when they were conducting this study if they were bent a little bit on the whole trappings of femininity that you discussed earlier.  Because if there is a way I can cut down on some of that priming I would be happy to.  Who am I trying to kid - I will prim and prop if it is going to be an unforgettable one night.  Catshing a husband will have to be a lesson for another day.

Now Denise you know you are going to have to do a piece on the trappings of masculinty so that maybe I can learn something.

Peace and a tub of hair grease

Michy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to warn you up front that I am not a linear thinker but I must say that this piece makes me wonder about your earlier piece on femininity.  </p>
<p>The authors of the study do not really quantify what makes a woman attractive and I wonder if it is the trappings of the femininity that we as women seek to buy, cover up, expose, stretch, diet away, tighten, exercise, or even hide.  I am curious about the features that make me the one night stand or the future mother of your children and wife.</p>
<p>Femininity has always been important to me just as maculinity is important to me &#8211; I can say that I can admire a square jaw, a defined nose and nice kissable lips which are quite attractive and dare I say sexy to me &#8211; but the size of the man also helps me to define masculine &#8211; I mean in my fantasy I see him as being masculine if he can lift me up or make me feel small and delicate in size or and don&#8217;t forget muscular.  These things make me want to sleep with him &#8211; I am not sure of the features that would make me even think of him as husbandly &#8211; I guess he would have to open his mouth so I could see the size of his brain to help me figure out that one.  But I would rather enjoy him first before pondering that life altering question.  Is it true that men only think about sex first and relationship second meanwhile women think the the other way around.  Now that don&#8217;t sound like any kind of fun to me.</p>
<p>So I wonder when they were conducting this study if they were bent a little bit on the whole trappings of femininity that you discussed earlier.  Because if there is a way I can cut down on some of that priming I would be happy to.  Who am I trying to kid &#8211; I will prim and prop if it is going to be an unforgettable one night.  Catshing a husband will have to be a lesson for another day.</p>
<p>Now Denise you know you are going to have to do a piece on the trappings of masculinty so that maybe I can learn something.</p>
<p>Peace and a tub of hair grease</p>
<p>Michy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
